The 10 Scariest Things About Asbestos Lawsuit History > 자유게시판

Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History

Many companies have been bankrupt due to asbestos lawsuits filed by victims. An asbestos lawyer can help you get compensation.

Experts in the health field have been warning for years about the dangers of exposure to asbestos. But, some industry leaders minimized the risks. As time went on, asbestos-related diseases became more prevalent.

The Third Case

Asbestos lawsuits really began to gain momentum in the 1970s, just after research studies began to link asbestos to severe illnesses such as mesothelioma or asbestosis. Tens of thousands of suits were filed because asbestos-related diseases do not usually show symptoms for decades after exposure. A majority of these lawsuits were brought in Texas, where favorable laws made it a preferred location for this litigation saga.

Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s and 1950s of asbestos-related products. This case had a significant impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s, it was discovered that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, placed profits above the health and safety of his employees. In his deposition testimony, Brown admitted to being heavily influenced by Dr. Russell Budd, the chief medical advisor of his company. Budd was a doctor who was famous for his indifference for the health of employees was a well-known persona.

Johns Manville was found to be aware of asbestos's dangers, but did not take any action to protect their workers. The court found that the company is liable for damages if workers later develop mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related illness. The court also held that the company was liable for damages for the families of deceased employees.

After the ruling in Borel, many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from companies that used the material. Most of the claims were denied for a variety reasons. Some cases were allowed to proceed, and the courts drew guidelines that have guided the handling of asbestos attorneys-related lawsuits.

In the 1990s asbestos defendants were seeking legal rulings to limit their liability. They wanted to to argue that asbestos materials were not a component of their product and therefore they shouldn't be held liable for injuries caused by people who employed with asbestos. These arguments were not successful and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the "asbestos products" defense.

Today, a mesothelioma victim's right to seek compensation from accountable parties in the case is protected by state and federal law. Insurance companies continue to fight against these claims.